MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Status: O
X-Status: 

>Brian
>
>Thanks for the clarification.  It is impressive how the networks of
>conversations become so clear when you move into different communities.
And I
>agree that any given versus generated conversation restricts us.  But that
also
>means when we answer the three questions we are, in fact, defining the
>parameters within which we choose to operate.  That is restrictive, but
>restrictive by choice and it's the choice that defines freedom to me.
>
>Heather


Can we agree that generative conversation is a characteristic of the state
of play of a conversation at the time. Yesterday's generative conversation
gives the thing that today I am merely repeating. Doesn't mean its not still
useful. Just we took the ground yesterday. And today we are camping on it.

Love, Andrew.


From ab@e24mp.demon.co.uk Fri Aug 14 23:46:07 1998
>From ab@e24mp.demon.co.uk  Fri Aug 14 23:46:07 1998
Received: from mx03.netaddress.usa.net (mx03.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.140])
	by pony-1.mail.digex.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA13433
	for ; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 23:46:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 14443 invoked by uid 0); 15 Aug 1998 03:46:06 -0000
Received: from post.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.27] by mx03 via mtad (2.6) 
	with ESMTP id mx03-cHoDUF0023; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 03:46:05 GMT
Received: from (e24mp.demon.co.uk) [194.222.94.249] 
	by post.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #2)
	id 0z7XI3-0005Zs-00; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 03:46:03 +0000
Message-ID: <010701bdc7fe$9ea86aa0$f95edec2@e24mp.demon.co.uk>